MRO purchases in the packaging industry are often made more complicated by strict health and safety rules but that doesn’t mean there aren’t opportunities to make efficiencies

The UK’s packaging, plastics and paper industries have a number of challenges in common when it comes to the indirect procurement cost of industrial supplies for Maintenance, Repair and Operations (MRO). These are industries where there is a lot of competition, margins are often tight and raw material costs vary hugely with currency fluctuations, such as those seen since the Brexit vote. As such, there is significant pressure on organisations to find efficiencies that will help their bottom line, and MRO is an area where significant savings can be made.

However, it is also an area, according to Del Tiwana, Industry Sector Manager at RS Components, that is often ignored by companies. “MRO is a complex beast and is frequently overlooked as customers spend a disproportionate time on direct spend categories,” he says. “This is understandable due to headline savings they can make on per-unit prices. But in some cases MRO categories become overlooked, leading to MRO meaning something closer to Miscellaneous Random and Out of control.”

The fact is that these manufacturers often run numerous pieces of plant machinery and order large amounts of replacement parts, tools and components over the course of the year. “What we’ve seen with Brexit is that for the last 12 months companies are focusing more and more of their time on procurement of direct materials and ingredients” says Tiwana. “So we have seen a bit of a downturn in customers focussing on ageing assets, which require more regular maintenance.”

 

Connected Thinking - Paper_Plastics_Packaging Stats - Infographic - 2019

 

Trusted suppliers
While this strategy is understandable in cost terms, it makes it vital to have a good MRO strategy in place, along with suppliers you can trust so that when machines do break down, it won’t cost your business money. As Helen Alder, the Chartered Institute of Procurement and Supply’s Head of Knowledge, explains: “Organisations don’t always understand what MRO is, and therefore they do not see the need or value in having a strategy in place.

“The most significant reason for getting this right is that among the products you purchase will be items that would cause your operations to grind to a halt if they went wrong and you can’t replace them quickly,” she adds. “Ultimately, the most important thing is to keep your business running so that you don’t have downtime that incurs costs and affects profitability.”

The answer is to work with fewer, trusted suppliers who carry the stock that engineers require and can deliver those products in the time required. For the packaging industry, this is made more complex by the need for a number of specialist parts or specific types of PPE safety-approved equipment. New regulations on personal protective equipment came into force in April 2019, making industry knowledge even more important.[1]

“The new regulations around PPE products - the footwear, gloves, ear defenders or glasses and so on - will fall into line with new technologies and manufacturing processes,” explains Tiwana. “It’s important for companies to work with distributors with a full, traceable supply chain. Both the distributors and manufacturers of those products are accountable, so as a distributor we can only sell products which conform to these regulations.”

Reducing “maverick” spending
This leads to another potential risk area with MRO procurement, both in terms of costs and actual safety – “maverick spending”. “This is a massive risk,” says Alder. “Buying parts from a non-approved suppliers may cost more and possibly take longer to source, but the biggest issue is the quality of the parts. It’s not unknown for engineers or other employees to search the internet and buy parts that turn out to be counterfeit, or that don’t meet the required quality levels. Where you have these products going into machines with moving parts, you have potentially very serious consequences if they go wrong.”

A survey of nearly 1,000 procurement professionals, carried out by RS Components and the Chartered Institute of Procurement and Supply (CIPS), found that close to a third (32%) of all businesses saw counterfeit parts as a significant concern.[2]

By working with a small group of approved suppliers, ideally ones that provide an integrated eProcurement system, which makes ordering easier for the end user, it’s possible to dramatically cut maverick spend and streamline the entire MRO process.

"So many manufacturers have stores full of all sorts of different brands and products, which are all classified as working capital"Del Tiwana, Industry Sector Manager, RS

The final area that companies should be reviewing is the amount of MRO stock held on site. “So many manufacturers in this sector have stores full of all sorts of different brands and products,” says Tiwana. “Holding this stock is classified as working capital. At RS we can help customers review that stock and in many cases work with them to free up cash.

“And, if a company has stock that is definitely needed on-site, it’s possible to support this through our comprehensive range of managed inventory services. The need to monitor and ensure cash is not tied up in unnecessary inventory such as industrial supplies, can be reduced by regularly reviewing stock, consumption and maintaining minimum and maximum levels.”

 

[1] EU Reg 2016/425 https://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/mechanical-engineering/personal-protective-equipment_en
[2] Indirect Procurement Report 2018: Drivers of change & how to respond